Review: Smith & Wesson M&P45 Shield Pistol

by
posted on December 20, 2016
shield.jpg (1)

We’ve all heard (and in some cases, repeated) the clichés. “Defensive calibers should start with ‘4’.” “The .45 ACP cartridge has won two world wars and countless other conflicts.” “Nine millimeter is for [insert derogative of choice].” The .45 ACP cartridge is American pie, baseball and an eight-cylinder engine all rolled into one, an American legend born in battle and time-tested in excess of a century. Despite the incredible advances in ammunition performance in recent times that have significantly blurred the lines between big-bore and intermediate, we still have a fondness for the big, slow-moving lug.

When it comes to pocket pistols, though, the love affair cools somewhat. In a 38-ounce, 5-inch-barrelled 1911, the .45 is easy to shoot; pleasant, even. In a 15-ounce, polymer-frame micro-gun, on the other hand, it becomes brutish and painful. There’s a reason so few pocket pistols are available in “plus size,” and at first blush, Smith & Wesson’s newest Shield variant may appear to fill a very small niche. Other than the Kahr CM/PM45 and the Springfield Armory XD-S, (nearly) pocketable .45 ACP semi-autos are quite rare, and with reason. Truncating the action to fit a small pistol can have deleterious effects on reliability—witness the trials and tribulations of the Officer’s model 1911.

But this is 2016. We’ve had decades upon decades of technological advances, better materials and a real market for improvements. Smith & Wesson’s Shield series, debuted in 2012, offered traditional 9 mm and .40 S&W chamberings, but the “full-size” variant would take four years to come to fruition. It makes good sense, in that the market is slim and the extant product line from Smith & Wesson is well-received and mature. Whether you’re a member of the .45 ACP fan club, want a backup pistol in the same caliber as your primary or simply want more power, there’s plenty of reason to look into the newest Shield.

(l.) With a crisp pull and fast reset, the familiar hinged trigger makes shooting the M&P45 Shield easy. (ctr.) Slide-stop and takedown levers are unobtrusive, but not ambidextrous. (r.) Cocking serrations both at the rear and front of the slide assist in charging the M&P45 Shield, while the massive extractor makes short work of fired cases.


The M&P45 Shield sports several subtle differences from its 9 mm and .40 S&W siblings. Most evident is the more-aggressive checkering on the grip that anchors the larger Shield in the hand, a helpful design that does not overreach into “cheese grater” territory. Also, visually distinct are the cocking serrations at the end of the slide, meant to assist in press-checks and charging of the pistol. Neither the 9 mm nor the .40 S&W versions sport serrations near the muzzle. Lastly, and the most subtle, the M&P45 Shield is slightly longer than the other variants, so check holster fit before changing calibers. The M&P45 Shield is not necessarily interchangeable with the 9 mm or .40 S&W variants.

All this is good, you say, but how does it shoot? All the changes and upgrades in the world don’t help if the pistol is physically punishing—and as the owner of a 12-ounce, .357 Mag. revolver, I’m familiar with punishing. Here’s where Smith & Wesson has clearly been working magic: the M&P45 Shield is not hard nor painful to shoot. It’s weird, too, because the .45 ACP version is actually .3 ounces lighter than the 9 mm variant (I’d wager the extra material machined out of the slide more than makes up for the .4-inch extra overall length). Whether it’s the extra grippiness of the texturing or some anti-recoil voodoo, the .45-caliber Shield doesn’t feel substantially worse than the 9 mm. Granted, this is all with the caveat that most small handguns (loosely defined as one you can’t get a full three-finger firing grip on) are going to be more difficult to shoot accurately than full-size siblings, but once the decision is made to go small, there’s scant difference between the 9 mm and the .45 ACP Shield with regard to felt recoil.

(l.) Dovetail-mounted for adjustment or replacement with night sights or fiber-optic versions, both the front and rear sights feature simple white dots. (r.)The Shield 45 is fed via seven-round extended or six-round flush-fit mags.


On the range, the M&P45 Shield proved nigh invulnerable. Recoil was noticeable but not punishing, accuracy was even better than expected and out of four different shooters who tested it, all had quite positive experiences. It’s not a bullseye pistol, but you shouldn’t expect that of it. Out of several hundred rounds fired, the worst that could be said of the entire experience was that the slide failed to lock back on an empty mag two or three times. Multiple bullet weights and varied construction—from FMJ to deep JHP and even the unique PolyCase ARX—fed, fired and ejected cleanly. The M&P45 Shield is accurate, reliable and packs plenty of punch—just what you want in a backup or “deep-cover” handgun.

Latest

Mossberg 500 and 590 shotguns
Mossberg 500 and 590 shotguns

Mossberg 500 and 590: America’s Defensive Shotguns

Since 1961, the O.F. (Oscar Frederick) Mossberg company has sold more than 11 million of its Model 500 pump-action shotguns, making it the most popular shotgun of all time, if not one of the most sold guns in any category, period.

Customizing the Colt Detective Special

Got a gun with that has seen better days? Perhaps Grandpa’s favorite gun was obviously “well loved?” Talented gunsmiths and other artisans are out there who can give your favorite firearm a much-needed face-lift.

First Look: Dead Air Armament Primal Suppressor

Dead Air Armament is adding the Primal, a new.46-caliber magnum rated suppressor to their lineup of firearms sound suppressors.

9/11 20 Years Later: A Special Smith & Wesson

There are still heroes in this world. We mourn the loss of one some 20 years later on the 20th anniversary of the September 11th attacks.

Why Defensive Firearms Training is So Important

Yes, you may never have to fire your handgun in defense of your life or family, but the possibility always exists.

Review: Smith & Wesson Shield Plus

In retrospect, Smith & Wesson had nobody to blame for the situation but themselves. The company didn’t invent the subcompact, lightweight, single-stack nine, of course. Walther and Beretta had preceded the original Shield to market by a few years with the PPS and the Nano, respectively, and Kahr had more or less created the niche back in the 1990s.

Interests



Get the best of Shooting Illustrated delivered to your inbox.