In Defense of A Third Party

Should you intervene?

by
posted on August 20, 2021
Sheriff Jim Wilson

One of the greatest pitfalls for the armed citizen is getting involved in the defense of a third party. Things may not always be what they seem to be at first look and assumptions are made that may turn out to be incorrect.

My suggestion is to avoid getting physically involved, especially using deadly force, unless the evidence is simply overpowering and obvious. I am aware of one such case in which a man was summoned to the home of a next-door neighbor and found that a man had the woman down on the bathroom floor, holding a knife to her throat. In addition, the suspect was also holding an infant child under the water of a full bathtub. The citizen first ordered the suspect to stop and desist. When this provided no results, the citizen shot the suspect three times, killing him. The victims lived and the citizen’s use of deadly force was ruled “justified.”

However, many acts of violence that we witness may not be so cut and dried. In my own case, I have decided not to intervene unless I know one of the parties involved. The other area that I would have a tough time just standing by is if a child is involved.

Most peace officers can relate stories about going on a domestic disturbance call and having to deal with the husband, in a physical manner, only to have the victim/wife attack them. Regardless, the officers have a duty to act, the citizen does not.

We may imagine all sorts of scenarios in which we consider going to the aid of a third party. The thing to keep in mind is that, by our actions, we may become the target of criminal prosecution and/or civil prosecution.

If one has doubts about getting physically involved, one might consider that it is also important to just be a good witness. Taking down vehicle license numbers is always important. And making cell-phone videos is of great value. Obviously, if you are properly trained, rendering first aid is always a great contribution.

Getting involved in the defense of a third party can lead to unintended results. The armed citizen is well advised to give this some serious thought, even to the point of seeking legal advice while deciding how to handle such situations. To think, “Oh boy, I’m fixing to be a hero”, is usually a mistake that the armed citizen should not make.

Latest

Mossberg 500 and 590 shotguns
Mossberg 500 and 590 shotguns

Mossberg 500 and 590: America’s Defensive Shotguns

Since 1961, the O.F. (Oscar Frederick) Mossberg company has sold more than 11 million of its Model 500 pump-action shotguns, making it the most popular shotgun of all time, if not one of the most sold guns in any category, period.

Customizing the Colt Detective Special

Got a gun with that has seen better days? Perhaps Grandpa’s favorite gun was obviously “well loved?” Talented gunsmiths and other artisans are out there who can give your favorite firearm a much-needed face-lift.

First Look: Dead Air Armament Primal Suppressor

Dead Air Armament is adding the Primal, a new.46-caliber magnum rated suppressor to their lineup of firearms sound suppressors.

9/11 20 Years Later: A Special Smith & Wesson

There are still heroes in this world. We mourn the loss of one some 20 years later on the 20th anniversary of the September 11th attacks.

Why Defensive Firearms Training is So Important

Yes, you may never have to fire your handgun in defense of your life or family, but the possibility always exists.

Review: Smith & Wesson Shield Plus

In retrospect, Smith & Wesson had nobody to blame for the situation but themselves. The company didn’t invent the subcompact, lightweight, single-stack nine, of course. Walther and Beretta had preceded the original Shield to market by a few years with the PPS and the Nano, respectively, and Kahr had more or less created the niche back in the 1990s.

Interests



Get the best of Shooting Illustrated delivered to your inbox.