California Lawmakers Reject Background Checks for Ammo Purchases

by
posted on September 9, 2014
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
sinews.jpg (118)

The California State Senate rejected SB 53, a bill introduced by incoming Senate president Kevin de Leon (D-Los Angeles) effectively requiring background checks for ammunition purchases.

Sen. de Leon originally proposed a measure requiring residents who purchase ammunition to obtain a state permit and undergo a background check before the purchase to ensure they could legally own firearms, but Gov. Jerry Brown opposed it.

As a result, SB 53 was amended numerous times in an attempt to force its passage. The version that failed by six votes on Aug. 30 would have required ammunition sellers to provide information on purchasers to the state Department of Justice after the fact, including buyer name, address and date of birth, in addition to the date of the sale, brand, ammunition type and quantity.

It was opposed by the National Rifle Association, National Shooting Sports Foundation and the California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees.

If passed, the measure would have created an ammunition registration list, just as California's universal background checks for gun purchases have created a registry for all types of firearms. It also would have empowered police not only to confiscate firearms from those "disqualified from owning them," but ammunition as well — after the fact.

Assemblyman Scott Wilk (R-Santa Clarita) explained his vote against the SB 53, saying,"I'm tired of this chamber picking winners and losers and if we pass this, we're going to kill another industry here in California."

The bill's defeat came less than a week after a federal judge found California's 10-day waiting period for firearms purchases unconstitutional.

In the decision issued Aug. 25, Federal Eastern District of California Senior Judge Anthony W. Ishii, appointed to the bench by President Bill Clinton, found that "the 10-day waiting periods of Penal Code [sections 26815(a) and 27540(a)] violate the Second Amendment" as applied to members of certain classifications, like Silvester and Combs, and "burdens the Second Amendment rights of the Plaintiffs."

Latest

aftermarket AR-15 grips
aftermarket AR-15 grips

Roundup: Aftermarket AR-15 Grips

Get a (better) grip on your AR-15.

Avoid The Issue

Preventive Defense—avoiding incidents rather than reacting to them—is the best defense.

First Look: Falco Multi-Fit Universal Holsters

Available in a wide range of materials and models.

First Look: XS Sights R3D 2.0 Night Sights for Springfield Echelon Pistols

The sights have a low profile, snag-free rear sight and a bright green or orange front sight.

Hornady Announces Get Loaded Plus Promotion

This promotion runs from now until the end of 2025. 

Review: Beretta 1301 Tactical C Shotgun

How do you improve on an excellent home-defense shotgun? Increase the capacity.

Interests



Get the best of Shooting Illustrated delivered to your inbox.