California Lawmakers Reject Background Checks for Ammo Purchases

by
posted on September 9, 2014
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
sinews.jpg (118)

The California State Senate rejected SB 53, a bill introduced by incoming Senate president Kevin de Leon (D-Los Angeles) effectively requiring background checks for ammunition purchases.

Sen. de Leon originally proposed a measure requiring residents who purchase ammunition to obtain a state permit and undergo a background check before the purchase to ensure they could legally own firearms, but Gov. Jerry Brown opposed it.

As a result, SB 53 was amended numerous times in an attempt to force its passage. The version that failed by six votes on Aug. 30 would have required ammunition sellers to provide information on purchasers to the state Department of Justice after the fact, including buyer name, address and date of birth, in addition to the date of the sale, brand, ammunition type and quantity.

It was opposed by the National Rifle Association, National Shooting Sports Foundation and the California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees.

If passed, the measure would have created an ammunition registration list, just as California's universal background checks for gun purchases have created a registry for all types of firearms. It also would have empowered police not only to confiscate firearms from those "disqualified from owning them," but ammunition as well — after the fact.

Assemblyman Scott Wilk (R-Santa Clarita) explained his vote against the SB 53, saying,"I'm tired of this chamber picking winners and losers and if we pass this, we're going to kill another industry here in California."

The bill's defeat came less than a week after a federal judge found California's 10-day waiting period for firearms purchases unconstitutional.

In the decision issued Aug. 25, Federal Eastern District of California Senior Judge Anthony W. Ishii, appointed to the bench by President Bill Clinton, found that "the 10-day waiting periods of Penal Code [sections 26815(a) and 27540(a)] violate the Second Amendment" as applied to members of certain classifications, like Silvester and Combs, and "burdens the Second Amendment rights of the Plaintiffs."

Latest

Falco duty holster
Falco duty holster

First Look: New Kydex Duty Holsters from Falco

Carry your duty pistol and keep it where it should be.

I Carry: TriStar APOC 9 mm Pistol in a Falco Holster

In this week's episode of "I Carry," we have a TriStar APOC 9 mm pistol in a Falco Holsters TalonGuard A910 holster with a Bear & Son D2 Rancher Sideliner pocketknife.

West Virginia Police Select Shadow Systems Pistols

The West Virginia State Police placed an order for 700 Shadow Systems pistols.

SAR USA SAR-9 Gen 3 Subcompact Pistol Review

The SAR9 Gen 3 Subcompact brings both performance and value to the table.

First Look: Warne Vapor Bipod

An inexpensive yet robust way to stabilize your rifle.

Handguns: Are Revolvers Extinct?

Will the medium-frame, double-action revolver go the way of the dinosaur?

Interests



Get the best of Shooting Illustrated delivered to your inbox.