http://www.shootingillustrated.com/index.php/1461/fnh-usa-fnar/ Article, Photos, Videos, and Blogs on Shooting Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:47:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.shootingillustrated.com/index.php/1461/fnh-usa-fnar/#comment-11147 Fnar test | Actorsinfo Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:02:34 +0000 http://www.shootingillustrated.com/?p=1461#comment-11147 [...] FNH-USA FNAR | Shooting IllustratedOct 28, 2010 … For testing, I outfitted the FNAR with a Leupold Mark 2 3-9×40 mm scope and mounted it with Brownells steel rings. Despite all the adjustments … [...] [...] FNH-USA FNAR | Shooting IllustratedOct 28, 2010 … For testing, I outfitted the FNAR with a Leupold Mark 2 3-9×40 mm scope and mounted it with Brownells steel rings. Despite all the adjustments … [...]

]]> http://www.shootingillustrated.com/index.php/1461/fnh-usa-fnar/#comment-212 james Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:37:56 +0000 http://www.shootingillustrated.com/?p=1461#comment-212 I will most likely be buying this gun today but in the winchester SX-AR version. Fromm all that I have read it is functionally the same gun. Just different color and missing the rails on the fore grip. I appreciate your review. Where are the accompanying results that you spoke of? I have read many reviews. About 75% have great things to say about the accuracy, the others are horrible. It is hard to vet out because of all the variables when it comes to shooters and their guns/optics. I will most likely be buying this gun today but in the winchester SX-AR version. Fromm all that I have read it is functionally the same gun. Just different color and missing the rails on the fore grip. I appreciate your review. Where are the accompanying results that you spoke of? I have read many reviews. About 75% have great things to say about the accuracy, the others are horrible. It is hard to vet out because of all the variables when it comes to shooters and their guns/optics.

]]>